IIESoc

In the process of planning for an IPv6 deployment, some desire to create a design analogous to private RFC1918 deployments. In this webinar we will discuss the structural differences between technologies such as RFC1918 and unique local addressing (ULA). We will address topics such as why they aren't the same, where they make sense, where they don't. We will also discuss the underlying implementations of address selection and how it relates to IPv6 differently than IPv4. Webinar participants should expect a mix of architectural policy and technical depth and come away with a better understanding of ULA and the mechanisms that define it.

​

This session will be presented by Nick Buraglio who has been in the networking industry since 1997, focusing primarily on service provider technologies, high performance networking, and disruptive technologies. He is currently in the planning and architecture team for Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) working on next generation traffic engineering and as the Department of Energy IPv6-only implementation lead.

The 6LoWPAN adaptation layer defines compression, fragmentation and reassembly, and frame delivery mechanisms for IPv6 datagrams. As specified in RFC 4944, when an entire IPv6 datagram fits within a single IEEE Std 802.15.4 frame, then the datagram is transmitted unfragmented without adding a fragmentation header in the LoWPAN encapsulation. On the opposite hand, if the compressed IPv6 datagram is larger than the IEEE Std 802.15.4 MTU (i.e., 127 bytes), then fragmentation is required to split the large datagram into multiple link-layer fragments of up to 127 bytes. The length of each link fragment is specified in multiples of eight bytes. The first part of this talk will be dedicated to the whole process of 6LoWPAN Fragmentation and Reassembly operation. The second part of the talk will be dedicated to 6LoWPAN Frame Delivery modes, the mesh under and the route over (or Per-Hop Fragmentation and Reassembly mode). Both approaches are widely employed in the Smart Grid networks around the world. The first mode takes place at the 6LoWPAN adaptation layer, where the nodes require the knowledge of the routes at Layer 2 based on MAC, whereas the second mode does it at Layer 3 based on IP. Finally, in the third and last part of the talk, an alternate approach called 6LoWPAN Fragment Forwarding (6LFF), i.e., RFC 8930, will be presented, whereby an intermediate node forwards a fragment without reassembling the complete IPv6 datagram first.

​

This session will be presented by Georgios Z. Papadopoulos who has received the prestigious French national ANR JCJC 2017 grant for young researchers. He has been involved in the organization and program committee of many international events, such as IEEE ISCC’20, IEEE DIPI’19, AdHoc-Now’18, IEEE CSCN’18, GIIS’18, IEEE ISCC’17. Moreover, he has been serving as Associate Editor for Wireless Networks journal and Internet Technology Letters since 2018. He is author of more than 60 peer-reviewed publications in the area of computer communications, networks and cybersecurity. He actively participates at the IETF standards organization with multiple drafts in the ROLL and RAW Working Groups. His research interests include Industrial IoT, 6TiSCH, 6lo, LoRa & LPWAN, Wireless Battery Management System, Smart Grid, Cybersecurity and Moving Target Defense. Dr. Papadopoulos has received the Best Ph.D. Thesis Award granted by the University of Strasbourg and he was a recipient of two Best Paper Awards (IFIP Med-Hoc-Net’14 and IEEE SENSORS’14).

In this session, we will provide an overview of how you can use IPv6 on AWS today - how to enable and migrate workloads at scale from IPv4-only to either dual-stack or IPv6-only architectures. We will cover the Amazon VPC IPv6 capabilities, how you can achieve IPv6 connectivity on AWS and hybrid network, and we’ll review common adoption patterns for hybrid connectivity, Internet-facing applications, and applications hosted on the edge. We’ll start with IPv6 address management on AWS using Amazon VPC IP Address Manager (IPAM) and take a step by step journey to an IPv6-enabled environment, with Amazon VPC, peering, Transit Gateway and Cloud WAN, Direct Connect and VPN, are more.

​

Alexandra Huides is working as a Networking Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS in Strategic Accounts. Alexandra is an experienced architect with an extensive background in IPv4/IPv6 network design (routing/switching), network security (IPSEC/GRE/MPLS), troubleshooting, and network overlays/virtualization, software-defined network design patterns and cloud networking solutions. She has designed and implemented multiple enterprise-scale networking solutions, spanning traditional data center technologies (Cisco/Juniper) and cloud vendors and services (AWS and Azure), and currently working with the largest scale AWS customers on their network infrastructure design.

IPv6 Extension Headers are an important part of the IPv6 protocol.  In this session, we will learn:

• What are the frequently-used Extension Headers?

• What is the basic architecture?

• How are they used?

• What is the nature of the controversy surrounding them?

We will also present the results of our testing of IPv6 Extension Headers on the Internet and next steps.

​

Nalini Elkins is the President of the Industry Network Technology Council.   She is also the CEO and Founder of Inside Products, Inc.  Nalini is a recognized leader in the field of computer performance measurement and analysis. In addition to being an experienced software product designer, developer, and planner, she has been the founder or co-founder of four start-ups in the high-tech arena.

​

Nalini started her career doing network design and monitoring for the Chevron network.  She specializes in network performance analysis, measurement, monitoring, tuning, and troubleshooting of large enterprise networks. One of her specialities is training and network design for IPv6 migration for large enterprises.  Many of the Fortune 1000 level companies as well as the large US government organizations, have taken her classes on various networking topics.

​

She has developed network monitoring and diagnostic products, which were later marketed by IBM and other software companies.   She received the A.A. Michelson award from the Computer Measurement Group for her contributions to the field.   Nalini is on the Advisory Board of the India Internet Engineering Society (IIESoc).

Mesh routing is difficult, mesh routing for low power and lossy networks is straight up comatose. This session will help understand how the signalling/messaging works and depict sample packet captures for RPL signalling from real environments. It will also introduce tools apart from wireshark, such as scapy that can help construct/deconstruct the messaging. Obtaining performance data for mesh networks is another aspect covered in the session. What makes taking performance difficult? What are the best practices and some of the case studies? The session will also provide a demo into creating a sample 10 node RPL network on a laptop and getting the packet capture for the network formation.

​

Rahul Jadhav is an avid coder, and a system engineer working on solutions involving network and transport optimization. I have contributed towards more than a dozen open sources including Linux Kernel and worked closely with IETF Standards Working Groups (such as ROLL, 6lo, LWIG) and Linux Foundation Groups. Taken several projects from conception to market. Architected metering infrastructure based on 802.15.4G + PLC/6lo/RPL for Smart Grids and has a special interest in scalable mesh network architectures for low-power networks and has contributed towards IETF protocol standardization in the domain. Currently, I am part of the Accuknox team figuring out the best way to handle Zero-Trust based Security solutions involving Cloud/Edge/IoT.

IPv6 ND was designed for P2P and transit subnetworks with cheap and reliable broadcast capabilities. This session will explain how this is unfit with IoT wireless operation, and explain the operation of SFAAC (stateful address autoconfiguration) that was introduced with 6LoWPAN ND.

The talk will discuss how SFAAC interacts with RPL and proxy ND to build scalable multi-link subnetworks, where the L3 concepts of Link and Subnet are not necessarily congruent with the layer 2 broadcast domain.

 

Pascal Thubert has been actively involved in research, development, and standards efforts on Internet mobility and wireless technologies since joining Cisco in 2000; he currently works at Cisco’s Chief Technology Office. Standards-wise, Pascal mostly contributes to the ETSI and the IETF. At the IETF, he co-chairs two IoT-related Working Groups and contributes to several others in the Internet and routing areas, where he authored 20+ RFCs the general context of IPv6, wireless, and the Internet of Things; he also contributed to the creation of  DetNet and RAW and participates to the IEEE/IETF coordination, the INT Area and the IoT directorates. Pascal holds an Engineering Degree from the Ecole Centrale de Lyon and a Ph.D. from IMT Atlantique, and above 300 patents.

RPL, the IETF standard for routing in low power lossy networks, was designed to meet unusual constraints in terms of scale (high), device capabilities (limited), and link reliability and capacity (very low). To meet those constraints, RFC 6550 introduced a number of innovations with the use of anisotropic routing, stretched P2P path, autonomic properties, objective functions, multi-topology routing, and a distance-vector operation that is proactive in setup but reactive in maintenance. RPL is now being extended at one extreme with a fully ADHOC mode called AODV RPL, and a centrally controlled mode called Route Projection. This session will browse through the main features of RFC 6550 and the route projection work.

 

The presenter, Pascal Thubert from Cisco, is a co-editor of RFC 8655 (the DetNet architecture), RFC 9030 (the 6TiSCH architecture), and the WIP draft RAW architecture, and well as the RPL routing protocol (RFC 6550), the 6LoWPAN Header Compression (RFC 6282) and Neighbor Discovery (RFC 8505 / 8928 / 8929) protocols.

In this IPv6 and 6LoWPAN Webinar, a detailed overview of the 6LoWPAN Adaptation layer will be given. Indeed, this webinar is dedicated on how 6LoWPAN enables to use of IPv6 over IEEE Std 802.15.4 networks. During this webinar, the following three objectives will be covered:

• First, the principles of IPv6 Header Format overview will be given, then the constraints that IPv6 presents over IEEE Std 802.15.4 technology are explored, and finally, an overview on 6LoWPAN Adaptation layer is introduced.

• The second objective is dedicated on 6LoWPAN header compression (i.e., RFC 6282) and IPv6 packet fragmentation mechanisms (i.e., RFC 4944) that allow the transmission of IPv6 packets over IEEE Std 802.15.4 radio links.

• The third and the last objective of this webinar is dedicated on standardized fragment forwarding approaches. This objective is split in two parts. In the first part, the two Frame Delivery modes (i.e., Mesh-Under and Route-Over) are described, while in the second part, an alternate approach called 6LoWPAN Fragment Forwarding (6LFF) is introduced, whereby an intermediate node forwards a fragment without reassembling the complete IPv6 datagram first (i.e., RFC 8930). Moreover, a 6LoWPAN Selective Fragment Recovery mechanism will be presented (i.e.,RFC 8931).

​

Georgios Z. Papadopoulos (MIEEE) serves as an Associate Professor at the IMT Atlantique in Rennes, France. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Bristol. He received his Ph.D. from University of Strasbourg, in 2015 with honors, his M.Sc. in Telematics Engineering from University Carlos III of Madrid in 2012 and his B.Sc. in Informatics from Alexander T.E.I. of Thessaloniki in 2011. Dr. Papadopoulos has participated in numerous international and national research projects on diverse networking verticals. He has received the prestigious French national ANR JCJC 2017 grant for young researchers. He has been involved in the organization and program committee of many international events, such as IEEE ISCC’20, IEEE DIPI’19, AdHoc-Now’18, IEEE CSCN’18, GIIS’18, IEEE ISCC’17. Moreover, he has been serving as Associate Editor for Wireless Networks journal and Internet Technology Letters since 2018. He is author of more than 60 peer-reviewed publications in the area of computer communications, networks and cybersecurity. He actively participates at the IETF standards organization with multiple drafts in the ROLL and RAW Working Groups. His research interests include Industrial IoT, 6TiSCH, 6lo, LoRa & LPWAN, Wireless Battery Management System, Smart Grid, Cybersecurity and Moving Target Defense. Dr. Papadopoulos has received the Best Ph.D. Thesis Award granted by the University of Strasbourg and he was a recipient of two Best Paper Awards (IFIP Med-Hoc-Net’14 and IEEE SENSORS’14). 

Despite the general benefits experienced with converging data, mail, voice, and video over IP, a number of domains in Operational Technology (OT) including Industrial IoT, vehicular automation, professional audio, and so on, still rely on semi-proprietary technologies for their the network operations. This is because machine-to-machine communications require deterministic properties such as guaranteed worst case latency and jitter and high reliability that traditional IP, which is based on statistical multiplexing and reactive congestion management, cannot offer.

In recent years, new work at IEEE 802.1 TSN and at the IETF with 6TiSCH, DetNet, and RAW, propose an evolution to IP networks that enable those deterministic properties for well characterized flows, over initially wired and then wireless networks. This session will introduce the concept of deterministic networking and how it applies to IoT, keeping in mind that machines are not necessarily small and constrained, and that automation applies to large things such as trains and nuclear plants. The architectures behind DetNet, 6TiSCH, and RAW, how they relate and specifically how they can leverage IPv6, will be browsed at a high level.

 

The presenter, Pascal Thubert from Cisco, is a co-editor of RFC 8655 (the DetNet architecture), RFC 9030 (the 6TiSCH architecture), and the WIP draft RAW architecture, and well as the RPL routing protocol (RFC 6550), the 6LoWPAN Header Compression (RFC 6282) and Neighbor Discovery (RFC 8505 / 8928 / 8929) protocols.

Microcontrollers have enabled adding processing and communication to many physical objects, but the result is not a simple copy of a general-purpose computing environment. Bringing these objects into the Internet requires attention to their specific constraints. Since 2005, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has been shaping Internet protocols toward the special requirements of such constrained devices, addressing a full stack from adaptation layers to the application layer, including security protocols. Looking at 17 years of standardization, what have we achieved, and what still needs to be completed to arrive at a true Internet of Things?

​

Carsten Bormann likes bringing the Internet to odd places. Honorary professor for Internet Technology at the Universität Bremen, he is a member of its Center for Computing and Communications Technology (TZI). His research interests are in protocol design and system architectures for networking. In the IETF, he mainly has been working on bringing Internet Technology to new links, applications, or radios. Since 2005, he has co-chaired, initiated, or co-authored many of the IETF efforts that now make up its Internet of Things (IoT) stack: he initiated the IETF work on Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) and the CoAP (Constrained Application) Protocol and co-chaired the IETF CoRE WG for its first ten years. Most recently, he launched the Thing-to-Thing Research Group (T2TRG) in the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). He has authored and co-authored 48 Internet RFCs, which have 439 citations in other Internet RFCs.

IP address Management (IPAM) is a critical tool of modern enterprise networks. IPAM not being a set Standard means there is a lot to consider when choosing an IPAM strategy and tool.  IPv6 can present challenges due to its sheer scale of available IP Addresses. We will walk through features that can make this a seamless process and how tools can dramatically improve our IPAM solution's accuracy and depth of information. We will finish up with a  dive into the role our IPAM solution plays in overall enterprise security.

​

Robert Nagy came to the world of technology with a long history as a corporate trainer and has been providing Professional Services and Network Training since 2000. He began his Technology Career providing all aspects of Design, Architecture and Implementation for Networking events around the country including:

* Microsoft/Global Briefing
* Microsoft/Professional Developers Conference
* Keynote Addresses of MacWorld
* Sun/Java One
* Sun/Networkers
* Cisco/Networkers

Rob credits the ever changing requirements, products demanded for networking events, and his work as a volunteer on the InterOp and IETF Network teams, as having given him a deep knowledge base in a broad spectrum of networking technologies. After leaving the world of professional event networking, Robert went on to work as a Professional Services Engineer for Infoblox, followed by a role as the Senior Network Engineer for Shutterfly, and then on to working as a Principal Security Consultant for Accuvant Inc.

Robert saw the need for an independent consulting company that did not compete for hardware sales, but rather focused on quality, comprehensive professional services and technical training development and delivery. This directive lead Robert to begin DeepDive Networking in 2008.

DHCP is so much more than assigning an IP address in our modern network environments. When moving to IPv6, this means we have a lot to consider and address.

• What are the common DHCP issues and considerations encountered when migrating to IPv6?

• How do we deal with the internet differences in DHCP in IPv4 versus IPv6?

• How about changes to much used features like DHCP failover and DHCP fingerprinting?

Finally we will look at DHCP's value in Network Security and how it can be an important part of your network security solution. 

​

Robert Nagy came to the world of technology with a long history as a corporate trainer and has been providing Professional Services and Network Training since 2000. He began his Technology Career providing all aspects of Design, Architecture and Implementation for Networking events around the country including:

* Microsoft/Global Briefing
* Microsoft/Professional Developers Conference
* Keynote Addresses of MacWorld
* Sun/Java One
* Sun/Networkers
* Cisco/Networkers

Rob credits the ever changing requirements, products demanded for networking events, and his work as a volunteer on the InterOp and IETF Network teams, as having given him a deep knowledge base in a broad spectrum of networking technologies. After leaving the world of professional event networking, Robert went on to work as a Professional Services Engineer for Infoblox, followed by a role as the Senior Network Engineer for Shutterfly, and then on to working as a Principal Security Consultant for Accuvant Inc.

Robert saw the need for an independent consulting company that did not compete for hardware sales, but rather focused on quality, comprehensive professional services and technical training development and delivery. This directive lead Robert to begin DeepDive Networking in 2008.

DNS is often an overlooked aspect of any network environment. When moving to IPv6, this is an important aspect that must be planned for and addressed.

• What are the common DNS issues encountered when migrating to IPv6?

• What changes are needed to DNS? 

• How can DNS assist in the move to IPv6?

We will dive into DNS and its relationship with implementing IPv6 in your environment.

​

Robert Nagy came to the world of technology with a long history as a corporate trainer and has been providing Professional Services and Network Training since 2000. He began his Technology Career providing all aspects of Design, Architecture and Implementation for Networking events around the country including:

* Microsoft/Global Briefing
* Microsoft/Professional Developers Conference
* Keynote Addresses of MacWorld
* Sun/Java One
* Sun/Networkers
* Cisco/Networkers

Rob credits the ever changing requirements, products demanded for networking events, and his work as a volunteer on the InterOp and IETF Network teams, as having given him a deep knowledge base in a broad spectrum of networking technologies. After leaving the world of professional event networking, Robert went on to work as a Professional Services Engineer for Infoblox, followed by a role as the Senior Network Engineer for Shutterfly, and then on to working as a Principal Security Consultant for Accuvant Inc.

Robert saw the need for an independent consulting company that did not compete for hardware sales, but rather focused on quality, comprehensive professional services and technical training development and delivery. This directive lead Robert to begin DeepDive Networking in 2008.
 

In this presentation Uma Chunduri talks about evolving 5G deployments in operator networks, in Multi-access Edge Clouds (MECs) as well as on-prem edges from requirements to network challenges. He talks about the ubiquitous and  intelligent computing demands and usage of IPv6 in these deployments. He also talks  about some of the unaddressed challenges in the network layer.

​

About Uma:

Uma S. Chunduri is a 5G NW Architect at Next Generation and Standards Group, Intel and working on MEC NW architecture, intelligent compute scaling, edge strategy and solutions.

Uma is an IP routing and wireless expert with 20+ years of R&D background and expertise in SPs, CoSPs and Cloud networks. He previously worked at Futurewei (Huawei USA) as a Distinguished Engineer & Sr. Director of Technology at Future Networks CTO office providing  solutions to enable various industry verticals with deterministic network services, 5G/B5G transport NW strategy and technology research & standardization. He is a technology contributor at ETSI, ITU-T FG2030 and at IETF with 10+ published RFCs and numerous Internet Drafts, as well as secured 50+ patents in his career. Uma was also with Intoto/Freescale Semiconductors, Kineto Wireless and was a Principal Systems Engineer at Ericsson R&D, USA. Uma is based in Santa Clara, California.

Concerned about adding a new protocol to your IP stack? Is someone in your company demanding that you have that capability on your mainframe? Don’t know what needs to be done and how much effort is involved? And what does it all mean?

Rob has done the hard work for you and can tell you what it takes to enable your mainframe systems for IPv6. This presentation will give you the few steps you need to get you going, to get IPv6 active on your z/OS system.

​

Rob started programming mainframe computers in 1971, and learned an exceptional array of languages, tools and techniques, all without internet assistance. He did some dazzling database work in the `80s, and wrote over half of the first online registration system for the University of Toledo. In the ‘90s he did contracts with three oil companies, a software company and a credit bureau, involving VM, MVS, VSE, OS/2, several flavors of Unix, and an equal variety of networking protocols. He is now with Chemical Abstracts Service, a division of the American Chemical Society, supporting z/OS, z/VM and Linux, along with proprietary networking software. He has been involved with and a fan of IPv6 since early this century, performing the configuration and software upgrades required to support it on the mainframe. He happily notes that the mainframe was the first platform configured for it, with applications using IPv6 sockets exclusively.  Rob is also co-author of RFC8250.

These sessions cover the following

• Introduction to Trace Reading

• IPv4 address structure

• IPv6 address structure

• IPv6 extension headers

• Security issues (header)

  • ​Malformed packets

  • Routing header

• Analyzing traces via Wireshark